<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>DECAF° blog für digitale kommunikation &#187; POSH</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.decaf.de/schlagwort/posh/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.decaf.de</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:55:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>POSH, FESCH and ROW: We got it together, baby.</title>
		<link>http://blog.decaf.de/2007/05/posh-plain-old-semantic-html-and-fesch/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.decaf.de/2007/05/posh-plain-old-semantic-html-and-fesch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 23:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dirk Schürjohann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[#]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTML]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microformats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[POSH]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.decaf.de/2007/05/posh-plain-old-semantic-html-and-fesch</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The colours of this posh thing on the left will clash with the ROW (Rest of this website). Sorry for that, but it&#8217;s a meaningful issue and we&#8217;ll have to be serious about it. Quiet is the new Loud, but POSH is no more than the same old everyday job with now having a name ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://blog.decaf.de/wp-content/uploads/are_you_posh.png" alt="" title="Are you POSH?" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-68" /></p>
<p>The colours of this posh thing on the left will clash with the ROW (Rest of this website). Sorry for that, but it&#8217;s a meaningful issue and we&#8217;ll have to be serious about it.</p>
<div class="clear mb1"></div>
<p>Quiet is the new Loud, but <strong>POSH</strong> is no more than the same old everyday job with now having a name for it. It&#8217;s about writing <strong>plain old semantic HTML</strong> instead of semantic html. It is <code>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</code> instead of <code>&lt;font&gt;&lt;/font&gt;</code>. And it is not beta but phi, chi or psi. It&#8217;s the web&#8217;s <em>All you need is love</em>, its <em>Street Fighting Man</em> or its <em>Bitter Sweet Symphony</em>. It is bigger than <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walt_Whitman">Walt Whitman</a> and smarter than <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._K._Rowling">Joanne K. Rowling</a>. It&#8217;s as strong as <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Fall_Guy">Colt Seavers</a>. A <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Russian_(cocktail)">White Russian</a> without old-fashioned glasses. It is perfectly well-balanced, you can read it without having to look at it. And it doesn&#8217;t smell. It sounds like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barry_white">Barry White</a> and we got it together, baby.<br />
All that is why we love it so much.</p>
<p><a href="http://microformats.org/wiki/posh"><strong>Read more about POSH</strong></a></p>
<p>And by the way: <a href="http://www.mindgarden.de/index.php?id=703">they say</a> that the german acronym for spicy websites may used to be »<strong>fesch</strong>«, which is <i>feines, einfaches, semantisch codiertes HTML</i>. It sounds similar to »Flash« but we like it anyway.</p>
<p><em>(POSH via <a href="http://www.vorsprungdurchwebstandards.de/blog/posh-wenn-websites-zu-spice-girls-werden/">Vorsprungdurchwebstandards</a>)</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.decaf.de/2007/05/posh-plain-old-semantic-html-and-fesch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

